<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I need a Solution!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/2010/02/i-need-a-solution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/2010/02/i-need-a-solution/</link>
	<description>MDM, Business Intelligence and Data Governance blogging from Charles Blyth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:24:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Julian Schwarzenbach</title>
		<link>http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/2010/02/i-need-a-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Schwarzenbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/?p=286#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Charles,

Spot on! and fully agree with Rob&#039;s comment. Technology is only one (possibly small) part of the overall data quality solution. You need to stop the sources of poor quality data (i.e. people and processes) before you get too involved in cleaning the data.

Julian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles,</p>
<p>Spot on! and fully agree with Rob&#8217;s comment. Technology is only one (possibly small) part of the overall data quality solution. You need to stop the sources of poor quality data (i.e. people and processes) before you get too involved in cleaning the data.</p>
<p>Julian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Blyth</title>
		<link>http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/2010/02/i-need-a-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Blyth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/?p=286#comment-95</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments Garnie,

You got it, keeping up with the business with business value is far better than keeping up with the Jones&#039;s.

PS: Don&#039;t sing Jim&#039;s song,  it gets stuck in your head if you do!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments Garnie,</p>
<p>You got it, keeping up with the business with business value is far better than keeping up with the Jones&#8217;s.</p>
<p>PS: Don&#8217;t sing Jim&#8217;s song,  it gets stuck in your head if you do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garnie Bolling</title>
		<link>http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/2010/02/i-need-a-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Garnie Bolling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/?p=286#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Now I am singing Jim&#039;s Song...  :) 

Charles, another great post... reminding us that we are focused on solutions, not feature function mapping to technical issues.  

I do not want to be that HoIM with the story&#039;s feature function slide deck.  

Now with MDM 2.0 or 3.0 or infinity... the changing dynamics of the business, our challenge is keeping up with them, with business value...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I am singing Jim&#8217;s Song&#8230;  <img src='http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Charles, another great post&#8230; reminding us that we are focused on solutions, not feature function mapping to technical issues.  </p>
<p>I do not want to be that HoIM with the story&#8217;s feature function slide deck.  </p>
<p>Now with MDM 2.0 or 3.0 or infinity&#8230; the changing dynamics of the business, our challenge is keeping up with them, with business value&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Blyth</title>
		<link>http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/2010/02/i-need-a-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Blyth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/?p=286#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Steve,

Thanks for your comments.  Tying in with what Rob said,  you need technology to provide the capability to solve a problem,  but you need that common sense dimension that drives your decisions.

Thanks again

Charles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments.  Tying in with what Rob said,  you need technology to provide the capability to solve a problem,  but you need that common sense dimension that drives your decisions.</p>
<p>Thanks again</p>
<p>Charles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Willetts</title>
		<link>http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/2010/02/i-need-a-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Willetts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/?p=286#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Charles, Nice post! As so often in our world folks want to throw a technical tool at a problem when a good common sense approach will work. The old \people, process and technology = data governance\ makes sense to us in the data governance field but to sell a progam benefits work the best. Data governance will trim the bottom line and that is what most C-level folks care about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles, Nice post! As so often in our world folks want to throw a technical tool at a problem when a good common sense approach will work. The old \people, process and technology = data governance\ makes sense to us in the data governance field but to sell a progam benefits work the best. Data governance will trim the bottom line and that is what most C-level folks care about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Blyth</title>
		<link>http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/2010/02/i-need-a-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Blyth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/?p=286#comment-90</guid>
		<description>You know,  as I typed HoIM,  I thought &quot;Jim is going to make something out of this&quot; and guess what,  he didn&#039;t fail me :)

Thanks Jim,  highlight of my week!

And to end it off with the perfect phrase “Focusing on the technical features and ignoring the business benefits isn’t going to provide the solution that the enterprise needs.”  is just class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know,  as I typed HoIM,  I thought &#8220;Jim is going to make something out of this&#8221; and guess what,  he didn&#8217;t fail me <img src='http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks Jim,  highlight of my week!</p>
<p>And to end it off with the perfect phrase “Focusing on the technical features and ignoring the business benefits isn’t going to provide the solution that the enterprise needs.”  is just class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/2010/02/i-need-a-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/?p=286#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the story of:

“HoIM and the Data Dwarfs”

***

Heigh-ho, Heigh-ho
It’s off to work we go
We&#039;ll mine the data asset the whole day through

Hi HoIM, Hi HoIM
How’s the business case go?

Heigh-ho, Heigh-ho
It&#039;s back to work we go
We dig up data quality problems by the score
A thousand defects, sometimes more
But we don&#039;t know what we dig them for

Hi HoIM, Hi HoIM
Thanks for the shiny new tools
The bells and whistles sure are cool
When all these powerful features peak
We’ll be happy little data mining geeks

Heigh-ho, Heigh-ho
It&#039;s back to work we go
Heh, where’d the business case go?

HoIM?  HoIM?
Oh, well - I guess we can forget about him

Heigh-ho, Heigh-ho
It&#039;s home from work we go

***

The moral of the story is:

“Focusing on the technical features and ignoring the business benefits isn’t going to provide the solution that the enterprise needs.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the story of:</p>
<p>“HoIM and the Data Dwarfs”</p>
<p>***</p>
<p>Heigh-ho, Heigh-ho<br />
It’s off to work we go<br />
We&#8217;ll mine the data asset the whole day through</p>
<p>Hi HoIM, Hi HoIM<br />
How’s the business case go?</p>
<p>Heigh-ho, Heigh-ho<br />
It&#8217;s back to work we go<br />
We dig up data quality problems by the score<br />
A thousand defects, sometimes more<br />
But we don&#8217;t know what we dig them for</p>
<p>Hi HoIM, Hi HoIM<br />
Thanks for the shiny new tools<br />
The bells and whistles sure are cool<br />
When all these powerful features peak<br />
We’ll be happy little data mining geeks</p>
<p>Heigh-ho, Heigh-ho<br />
It&#8217;s back to work we go<br />
Heh, where’d the business case go?</p>
<p>HoIM?  HoIM?<br />
Oh, well &#8211; I guess we can forget about him</p>
<p>Heigh-ho, Heigh-ho<br />
It&#8217;s home from work we go</p>
<p>***</p>
<p>The moral of the story is:</p>
<p>“Focusing on the technical features and ignoring the business benefits isn’t going to provide the solution that the enterprise needs.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Blyth</title>
		<link>http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/2010/02/i-need-a-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Blyth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/?p=286#comment-88</guid>
		<description>Thanks Rob,

Some good points here,  I realy like the idea of &#039;partnering&#039; with the C level executive.

Re the graphic,  I bought it from a site called fotolia.com, thought it was worth paying for :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Rob,</p>
<p>Some good points here,  I realy like the idea of &#8216;partnering&#8217; with the C level executive.</p>
<p>Re the graphic,  I bought it from a site called fotolia.com, thought it was worth paying for <img src='http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Paller</title>
		<link>http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/2010/02/i-need-a-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Paller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/?p=286#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Great post! As Ken and Phil W. pointed out, it is all to easy for us data professionals to be distracted by something new and shiny. Apple Keynotes are a great example of how to garner this type of attention from technophiles and geeks. But you have hit on a great point, the C level executives want their problem solved they don&#039;t care about what gets us salivating over one vendor&#039;s products. 

More often the problem is a people and process issue that technology is helping facilitate the solution. If a data professional&#039;s pitch to the C level executive focuses solely on the new shiny then they are likely missing out on 80% of the problem. It is the data professional&#039;s responsibility to partner with  and sometimes convince the C level executive around the idea of people and process in order to gain the momentum needed to enact change in the organization.

Lastly, I love the image for this post. Where did you find it, if I may ask.

Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! As Ken and Phil W. pointed out, it is all to easy for us data professionals to be distracted by something new and shiny. Apple Keynotes are a great example of how to garner this type of attention from technophiles and geeks. But you have hit on a great point, the C level executives want their problem solved they don&#8217;t care about what gets us salivating over one vendor&#8217;s products. </p>
<p>More often the problem is a people and process issue that technology is helping facilitate the solution. If a data professional&#8217;s pitch to the C level executive focuses solely on the new shiny then they are likely missing out on 80% of the problem. It is the data professional&#8217;s responsibility to partner with  and sometimes convince the C level executive around the idea of people and process in order to gain the momentum needed to enact change in the organization.</p>
<p>Lastly, I love the image for this post. Where did you find it, if I may ask.</p>
<p>Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Blyth</title>
		<link>http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/2010/02/i-need-a-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Blyth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesblyth.co.uk/?p=286#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments Phil (at this rate I could automate that response:))

Always good to get a view from either side,  and even better when it can come from the same guy!

Maybe we should market a &#039;requirements gathering&#039; peace pipe ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments Phil (at this rate I could automate that response:))</p>
<p>Always good to get a view from either side,  and even better when it can come from the same guy!</p>
<p>Maybe we should market a &#8216;requirements gathering&#8217; peace pipe &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

